16:22:05 <HugoDaniel> i really like node.js
17:42:11 <stepcut> why is it likeable?
17:42:11 <lambdabot> stepcut: You have 1 new message. '/msg lambdabot @messages' to read it.
21:20:00 <HugoDaniel2> :D
21:20:09 <HugoDaniel2> when is happstack 6 expected ?
21:20:29 <stepkut> I was hoping this month, but my move took longer than expected
21:20:38 <HugoDaniel2> allright :D
21:20:42 <stepkut> but perhaps an RC this month
21:20:51 <HugoDaniel2> very nice
21:21:17 <HugoDaniel2> let me show you some code i often do with happstack
21:21:36 <stepkut> I'll be glad to have 0.6 out, because 0.7 is going to be a fun release to work :)
21:22:11 <McManiaC> happstack 6.0 ? :>
21:22:49 <stepkut> this is the only bug I know of offhand, http://code.google.com/p/happstack/issues/detail?id=126, for 0.6. But there is still some work to do to finish breaking up simpleHTTP into bit size pieces, and then getting the haddock docs updated
21:22:51 <Entroacceptor> no, that can't be, it's web! it has to stay at Happstackr 2.0 beta
21:23:05 <HugoDaniel2> :D
21:23:05 <stepkut> happstack is not even at 1.0 yet ;)
21:23:28 <stepkut> maybe after sharding support we can call it 1.0beta :p
21:23:29 <HugoDaniel2> then when 0.9 gets released
21:23:45 <HugoDaniel2> it starts grown like 0.9.1 0.9.2
21:23:47 <HugoDaniel2> :D
21:23:53 <HugoDaniel2> s/grown/growing
21:23:57 <stepkut> nah, just go to 0.10
21:24:04 <HugoDaniel2> :)
21:24:20 <stepkut> that's what emacs did for a long time, then eventually they just dropped the 0.
21:24:20 <HugoDaniel2> 0.999999.0
21:24:35 <McManiaC> or the kernel :)
21:24:42 <HugoDaniel2> it might be usefull for some quick n dirty patches
21:25:08 <HugoDaniel2> *remote buffer overflow fix
21:25:11 <HugoDaniel2> things like that
21:25:11 <stepkut> It would be nice to have hyena support before 1.0
21:25:26 <HugoDaniel2> :)
21:25:49 <HugoDaniel2> i keep thinking of cool features for happstack
21:25:53 <HugoDaniel2> oh
21:25:55 <HugoDaniel2> anyway
21:25:59 <HugoDaniel2> here is my common boilerplate
21:26:02 <HugoDaniel2> http://hpaste.org/40069/happstack_boilerplate
21:26:27 <HugoDaniel2> how can i do this much elegantly ?
21:28:11 <stepkut> why not do, msum [ dir "newform" $ answer emptyFormJSON , dir "singleLineText" .., etc ]
21:28:12 <stepkut> ?
21:28:36 <HugoDaniel2> oh
21:29:00 <HugoDaniel2> and... what if i have something like /dir1/someID ?
21:29:27 <stepkut> dir "dir1" $ path \someId -> ...
21:29:42 <HugoDaniel2> ah
21:29:43 <stepkut> where someId is a type with a FromPathReq instance
21:30:05 <stepkut> http://happstack.com/docs/crashcourse/RouteFilters.html#variable_path_segments
21:30:27 <HugoDaniel2> thanks
21:30:30 <HugoDaniel2> i should have read those
21:30:48 <stepkut> well, they are new .. part of the 0.6 release
21:30:58 <stepkut> as such, some of the sections reflect 0.6-only features
21:31:15 <HugoDaniel2> cool
21:31:16 <stepkut> but that section should be the same
22:04:31 <HugoDaniel2> ok is like return, right ?
22:04:39 <stepkut> a bit
22:05:39 <stepkut> it is basically,
22:05:47 <stepkut> ok val = setResponseCode 200 >> return val
22:11:51 <HugoDaniel2> allright, hpaste now runs hlint :D
22:12:39 <stepkut> :)
22:12:52 <stepkut> we need to port hpaste back to happstack :)
22:17:03 <HugoDaniel2> ah
22:17:07 <HugoDaniel2> whats it runing on now ?
22:17:13 <HugoDaniel2> fcgi ?
22:24:57 <HugoDaniel2> "FromReqURI a" is a great idea
22:25:05 <HugoDaniel2> how could i live for so long without this! ?
22:25:57 <stepkkut> beats me
22:26:10 <HugoDaniel2> :)
22:26:25 <HugoDaniel2> it must have been in happstack since ever, right ?
22:27:30 <stepkkut> yep. it was in HAppS even
22:31:28 <HugoDaniel2> xiiiii
22:31:30 <HugoDaniel2> eheh
22:31:32 <HugoDaniel2> pitty me
22:32:03 <HugoDaniel2> i use it sparingly, most of the stuff goes through post data
23:06:12 <stepkkut> the post data stuff is better in 0.6